Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Architecture Fabrication (nm) Family Release Date Code name Model Group Cores SMT Clock rate () Bus Speed & Type [a] Cache Socket Memory Controller Features L1 L2
AMD K7 Athlon – microarchitecture of the AMD Athlon classic and Athlon XP microprocessors. Was a very advanced design for its day. Was a very advanced design for its day. First generation was built with a separate L2-cache chip on a board inserted into a slot ( A ) and introduced extended MMX .
The AMD K6 is based on the Nx686 microprocessor that NexGen was designing when it was acquired by AMD. Despite the name implying a design evolving from the K5 , it is in fact a totally different design that was created by the NexGen team, including chief processor architect Greg Favor, [ 1 ] [ 2 ] and adapted after the AMD purchase.
Piledriver is the AMD codename for its improved second-generation microarchitecture based on Bulldozer. AMD Piledriver cores are found in Socket FM2 Trinity and Richland based series of APUs and CPUs and the Socket AM3+ Vishera based FX-series of CPUs. Piledriver was the last generation in the Bulldozer family to be available for socket AM3 ...
The Synergistic Processing Element or Unit (SPE or SPU) is a component in the Cell microprocessor. Processors based on different circuit technology have been developed. One example is quantum processors, which use quantum physics to enable algorithms that are impossible on classical computers (those using traditional circuitry).
As a result of AMD's 64-bit contribution to the x86 lineage and its subsequent acceptance by Intel, the 64-bit RISC architectures ceased to be a threat to the x86 ecosystem and almost disappeared from the workstation market. x86-64 began to be utilized in powerful supercomputers (in its AMD Opteron and Intel Xeon incarnations), a market which ...
Image Source: Getty Images. Why 2025 could be a pivotal year for AMD. Much of the reason why Nvidia experienced such enormous growth in its data center business stems from the fact that the ...
Intel beat AMD to market by nearly four years, but AMD priced its 40 MHz 486 at or below Intel's price for a 33 MHz chip, offering about 20% better performance for the same price. While competing 486 chips, such as those from Cyrix , benchmarked lower than the equivalent Intel chip, AMD's 486 matched Intel's performance on a clock-for-clock basis.