When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Worcester v. Georgia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia

    Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Marshall ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Summary Talbot v. Seeman: 5 U.S. 1 (1801) Marine salvage rights in time of war Marbury v. Madison: 5 U.S. 137 (1803) judicial review of laws enacted by the United States Congress: Stuart v. Laird: 5 U.S. 299 (1803) enforceability of rulings issued by judges who have since been removed from office Murray v. The Charming Betsey ...

  4. Samuel Worcester - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Worcester

    Worcester was arrested in Georgia and convicted for disobeying the state's law restricting white missionaries from living in Cherokee territory without a state license. On appeal, he was the plaintiff in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), a case that went to the United States Supreme Court. The court held that Georgia's law was unconstitutional.

  5. Trail of Tears - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trail_of_Tears

    In the years after the Indian Removal Act, the Cherokee filed several lawsuits regarding conflicts with the state of Georgia. Some of these cases reached the Supreme Court, the most influential being Worcester v. Georgia (1832). [citation needed] Samuel Worcester and the group of white Christian missionaries he was in were convicted by Georgia ...

  6. Cherokee removal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherokee_removal

    Georgia (1831), the Marshall court ruled that the Cherokee were not a sovereign and independent nation, and therefore refused to hear the case. However, in Worcester v. State of Georgia (1832), the Court ruled that Georgia could not impose laws in Cherokee territory, since only the national government – not state governments – had authority ...

  7. Worcester teen could be first on trial for racketeering in ...

    www.aol.com/worcester-teen-could-first-trial...

    The lawyer has argued the case should be thrown out because King’s right to a speedy trial under Georgia law has been violated, an argument the trial judge rejected. Aslan King and Ayla King in ...

  8. Why is Georgia vs. Georgia Tech called Clean, Old-Fashioned ...

    www.aol.com/why-georgia-vs-georgia-tech...

    Georgia vs. Georgia Tech is a 130-year rivalry that has well-earned the moniker "Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate," one of the best in college football.

  9. John Marshall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Marshall

    In the case of Worcester v. Georgia, Marshall held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.