Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Motivational reasons explain why someone acts the way they do while normative reasons explain why someone ought to act in a certain way. Ideally, the two overlap, but they can come apart. For example, liking chocolate cake is a motivational reason for eating it while having high blood pressure is a normative reason for not eating it.
Means, on the other hand, are based on instrumental desires which want something for the sake of something else and thereby depend on other desires. [ 34 ] [ 35 ] So on this view, practical reason is about how to achieve something but it does not concern itself with what should be achieved. [ 36 ]
[11] The sufficient reason for a necessary truth is that its negation is a contradiction. [4] Leibniz admitted contingent truths, that is, facts in the world that are not necessarily true, but that are nonetheless true. Even these contingent truths, according to Leibniz, can only exist on the basis of sufficient reasons.
Hume famously claimed that reason is, and ought to be, only the slave of the passions. Humeans or Neo-Humeans do not typically hold strictly to Hume's views because, for one thing, they do not think of the passions in the same way that Hume did. Nonetheless, Humeans take their inspiration from Hume in claiming that reason alone is insufficient ...
This question has been written about by philosophers since at least the ancient Parmenides (c. 515 BC). [1] [2]"Why is there anything at all?" or "Why is there something rather than nothing?" is a question about the reason for basic existence which has been raised or commented on by a range of philosophers and physicists, including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, [3] Ludwig Wittgenstein, [4] and ...
Nonetheless a host of reasons can factor into the overall ranking, including awareness—something that Musk definitely doesn’t lack. Another element that plays a role particularly among ...
Will therefore is the last appetite in deliberating. And though we say in common discourse, a man had a will once to do a thing, that nevertheless he forbore to do; yet that is properly but an inclination, which makes no action voluntary; because the action depends not of it, but of the last inclination, or appetite.
The desire together with the belief is often referred to as the reason for the action. [3] [4] Causalist theories of action usually hold that this reason explains the action because it causes the action. [3] [6] Behavior that does not have a reason is not an action since it is not intentional. Every action has a reason but not every action has ...