When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Malloy v. Hogan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malloy_v._Hogan

    The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits state infringement of the privilege against self-incrimination just as the Fifth Amendment prevents the federal government from denying the privilege. In applying the privilege against self-incrimination, the same standards determine whether an accused's silence is justified regardless of whether it is a ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    An involuntarily committed, legally competent patient who refused medication had a right to professional medical review of the treating psychiatrist's decision. The Court left the decision-making process to medical professionals. 14th 1990 Washington v. Harper: Prisoners have only a very limited right to refuse psychotropic medications in prison.

  4. Self-incrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-incrimination

    In criminal law, self-incrimination is the act of making a statement that exposes oneself to an accusation of criminal liability or prosecution. [1] Self-incrimination can occur either directly or indirectly: directly, by means of interrogation where information of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed; or indirectly, when information of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed voluntarily ...

  5. Kastigar v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kastigar_v._United_States

    Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled on the issue of whether the government's grant of immunity from prosecution can compel a witness to testify over an assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

  6. Garrity v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrity_v._New_Jersey

    Case history; Prior: State v. Naglee, 44 N.J. 209, 207 A.2d 689 (1965); State v. Holroyd, 44 N.J. 259, 208 A.2d 146 (1965).: Holding; Where police officers being investigated were given choice either to incriminate themselves or to forfeit their jobs under New Jersey statute on ground of self-incrimination, and officers chose to make confessions, confessions were not voluntary but were coerced ...

  7. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Self-Incrimination clause provides various protections against self-incrimination, including the right of an individual not to serve as a witness in a criminal case in which he or she is a defendant. "Pleading the Fifth" is a colloquial term often used to invoke the Self-Incrimination Clause when witnesses decline to answer questions where ...

  8. United States v. Hubbell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Hubbell

    Under the Act of Production Doctrine, the act of an individual in producing documents or materials (e.g., in response to a subpoena) may have a "testimonial aspect" for purposes of the individual's right to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to the extent that the individual's act of production provides information ...

  9. Spevack v. Klein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spevack_v._Klein

    Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967) was a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the court held in a plurality decision that the Self-incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment applied even to attorneys in a state bar association under investigation, and an attorney asserting that right may not be disbarred for invoking it.