When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: 22 451 overturned damages its value

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v...

    Justice Roberts' opinion stated that prior administrative actions and court decisions decided under Chevron deference are not overturned by this decision, [18] [19] and in lieu of Chevron, agency interpretation can still be respected under the weaker Skidmore deference established in Skidmore v. Swift & Co. (1944). [14]

  3. New York business fraud lawsuit against the Trump Organization

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_business_fraud...

    New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within the Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).

  4. Attorney General v Blake - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_General_v_Blake

    Attorney General v Blake [2000] UKHL 45, [2001] 1 AC 268 is a leading English contract law case on damages for breach of contract. It established that in some circumstances, where ordinary remedies are inadequate, restitutionary damages may be awarded.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 451

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman: 451 U.S. 1: 1981: United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell: 451 U.S. 56

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Nike's irrevocable promise not to enforce its trademark against its competitor mooted the competitor's lawsuit to invalidate the trademark. Smith v. United States (2013) 11-8976: 2013-01-09 A defendant bears the burden of proving a defense of withdrawal from conspiracy. Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida: 11-626: 2013-01-15

  7. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastman_Kodak_Co._v._Image...

    Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992), is a 1992 Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that even though an equipment manufacturer lacked significant market power in the primary market for its equipment—copier-duplicators and other imaging equipment—nonetheless, it could have sufficient market power in the secondary aftermarket for repair parts to ...

  8. Recovery of funds from the Madoff investment scandal

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recovery_of_funds_from_the...

    Ruth Madoff's combined assets with her husband had a net worth of between $823 million and $826 million.She had $92.6 million in assets listed in her own name: [9] the $7 million penthouse on Manhattan's Upper East Side; an $11 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida; a three-bedroom apartment in Cap d'Antibes on the French Riviera valued at $1.5 million; $45 million in municipal bonds and $17 ...

  9. Murphy v. IRS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._IRS

    The Court had issued its original opinion, written by Chief Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg and joined by Judges Judith Rogers and Janice Rogers Brown, on August 22, 2006.The opinion had struck down 26 U.S.C. § 104(a)(2) to the extent that the statute purported to categorize compensatory damages for emotional distress and loss of reputation as being includible in gross income for Federal income tax ...