Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
is empty, but the collection is not almost disjoint; in fact, the intersection of any two distinct sets in this collection is infinite. The possible cardinalities of a maximal almost disjoint family (commonly referred to as a MAD family) on the set of the natural numbers has been the object of intense study.
Two disjoint sets. In set theory in mathematics and formal logic, two sets are said to be disjoint sets if they have no element in common. Equivalently, two disjoint sets are sets whose intersection is the empty set. [1] For example, {1, 2, 3} and {4, 5, 6} are disjoint sets, while {1, 2, 3} and {3, 4, 5} are not disjoint. A collection of two ...
More generally, a collection of any sets whatsoever is called a family of sets, set family, or a set system. Additionally, a family of sets may be defined as a function from a set I {\displaystyle I} , known as the index set, to F {\displaystyle F} , in which case the sets of the family are indexed by members of I {\displaystyle I} . [ 1 ]
A disjoint union of a family of pairwise disjoint sets is their union. In category theory , the disjoint union is the coproduct of the category of sets , and thus defined up to a bijection . In this context, the notation ∐ i ∈ I A i {\textstyle \coprod _{i\in I}A_{i}} is often used.
For instance, the family of functions from the natural numbers to the integers is the uncountable set of integer sequences. The subfamily { f ∈ Z N : f has finite support } {\displaystyle \left\{f\in \mathbb {Z} ^{\mathbb {N} }:f{\text{ has finite support }}\right\}} is the countable set of all integer sequences that have only finitely many ...
This updating is an important part of the disjoint-set forest's amortized performance guarantee. There are several algorithms for Find that achieve the asymptotically optimal time complexity. One family of algorithms, known as path compression, makes every node between the query node and the root point to the root. Path compression can be ...
In a non-separable space, the same argument shows a pairwise disjoint subfamily exists, but that family need not be countable. The result may fail if the radii are not bounded: consider the family of all balls centered at 0 in R d; any disjoint subfamily consists of only one ball B, and 5 B does not contain all the balls in this family.
A family of fuzzy sets = is disjoint, iff the family of underlying supports = ( ()) is disjoint in the standard sense for families of crisp sets. Independent of the t/s-norm pair, intersection of a disjoint family of fuzzy sets will give ∅ again, while the union has no ambiguity: