When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Paramountcy (Canada) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramountcy_(Canada)

    Paramountcy is relevant where there is conflicting federal and provincial legislation. As Justice Major explained in Rothmans: [1]. The doctrine of federal legislative paramountcy dictates that where there is an inconsistency between validly enacted but overlapping provincial and federal legislation, the provincial legislation is inoperative to the extent of the inconsistency.

  3. Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_33_of_the_Canadian...

    The clause has been invoked most frequently by Quebec, including the blanket application of the clause to every law from 1982–1985, a French-only sign law in 1988, a law prohibiting state-affiliated employees from wearing religious symbols in 2019, [17] and a law strengthening the use of French in 2022. Saskatchewan passed a back-to-work law ...

  4. Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_15_of_the_Canadian...

    Under the heading of "Equality Rights" this section states: 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

  5. Halsbury's Laws of Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halsbury's_Laws_of_Canada

    Halsbury's Laws of Canada is a comprehensive national encyclopedia of Canadian law, published by LexisNexis Canada, which includes federal, provincial and territorial coverage. It is the only Canadian legal encyclopedia covering all fourteen Canadian jurisdictions. Following an alphabetized title scheme, [1] it covers 119 discrete legal ...

  6. Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_11_of_the_Canadian...

    (d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal; This right has generated some case law, as courts have struck down reverse onus clauses as violating the presumption of innocence. This first occurred in R. v. Oakes (1986) in respect to the Narcotics Control Act.

  7. Section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_3_of_the_Canadian...

    No formal right to vote existed in Canada before the adoption of the Charter.There was no such right, for example, in the Canadian Bill of Rights.Indeed, in the case Cunningham v Homma (1903), it was found that the government could legally deny the vote to Japanese Canadians and Chinese Canadians (although both groups would go on to achieve the franchise before section 3 came into force).

  8. Good faith (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_faith_(law)

    The two duties are equally relevant to both Québec's civil law and the other provinces' and territories' common law approaches to contract law, representing an attempt by the Supreme Court of Canada to extend the duties of good faith embedded in Québecois law to the jurisprudence of the country's common law jurisdictions. Additionally, in the ...

  9. Preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_Canadian...

    The words "principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law" also appear in the party's official policies regarding what they feel all laws should be based upon, and the party states, "'Human rights' as expressed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms can only, therefore, be legitimately interpreted in light of, or in ...