Ad
related to: us v butler summary pdf
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936), is a U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the U.S. Congress has not only the power to lay taxes to the level necessary to carry out its other powers enumerated in Article I of the U.S. Constitution, but also a broad authority to tax and spend for the "general welfare" of the United States. [1]
Though at first the court had accepted some of the New Deal legislation over the objections of the four conservative justices, [1] in the 1935 term, the Four Horsemen, together with Roberts and Hughes, voided the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 (United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 [1936]), along with the Federal Farm Bankruptcy Act, the ...
United States 294 U.S. 317 (1935): The owner of $106,300 in federal gold certificates surrendered them as required by Executive Order 6102, receiving only their face value in currency. He sued in the United States Court of Claims for an additional $64,000 representing the loss of the dollar against gold.
Over the decades since, copyright in the United States has become a more complicated system with longer terms and more tests, and has been the subject of many decisions by the Court. The Supreme Court was the source of a number of concepts in the field, including fair use , the idea-expression divide , the useful articles or separability ...
Shortly after, the Supreme Court reaffirmed this provision in United States v. United States Shoe Corp. in 1998. [ 49 ] As part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, a harbor maintenance tax ( 26 U.S.C. § 4461 ) was imposed at the ad valorem (percentile) rate of 0.125% the value of the cargo instead of at a rate dependent entirely ...
Summary 1921–1959; Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. 261 U.S. 45: 1923: United States v. General Electric Co. 272 U.S. 476: 1926: A patentee who has granted a single license to a competitor to manufacture the patented product may lawfully fix the price at which the licensee may sell the product. American Fruit Growers v ...
R v Butler, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 452 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on pornography and state censorship. In this case, the Court had to balance the right to freedom of expression under section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms with women's rights.
Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960), was a US Supreme Court decision that held the "silver platter doctrine", which allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence illegally gathered by state police, to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.