When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: acquittal judgments in 138 cases of police report in pennsylvania

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Commonwealth v. Brady - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_v._Brady

    Commonwealth v. Brady, 510 Pa. 123, 507 A.2d 66 (Pa. 1986), [1] is a case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1986 which overruled close to two centuries of decisional law in Pennsylvania and established a common law exception to the rule against hearsay.

  3. List of wrongful convictions in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wrongful...

    The police even admitted at a hearing that there was no scientific support for their case. In January 1998, a jury acquitted Susie of the charges. [205] Oct 24, 1987: Willie Grimes Rape, kidnapping Hickory, North Carolina: Life in prison and 9 years 24 years, 9 months, 23 days Yes

  4. Sexual abuse scandal in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_scandal_in...

    The new law: abolishes Pennsylvania's criminal statute of limitations on childhood sexual abuse and extends the timeline victims have to file civil action against their abusers; clarifies penalties for failure to report child abuse; makes conversations with law enforcement agents exempt from non-disclosure agreements; and creates a fund for ...

  5. Category:Criminal trials that ended in acquittal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Criminal_trials...

    Criminal trials that ended in acquittal, meaning that the prosecution failed to prove that the accused was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the charge presented. See also: Category:People acquitted of crimes

  6. Pennsylvania v. Muniz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Muniz

    Pennsylvania v. Muniz , 496 US 582 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Self-incrimination Clause of the 5th Amendment and the meaning of “testimonial” under the 5th Amendment. A drunk-driving suspect, Muniz, made several incriminating statements while in police custody, and the Supreme Court held that only one of these ...

  7. Commonwealth v. Matos - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_v._Matos

    Commonwealth v. Matos, 672 A.2d 769 (1996), is a Pennsylvania State Supreme Court case which further developed Pennsylvania Constitutional Law as affording greater privacy protections than those guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.