Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For example, T. S. Eliot typed rather than wrote the manuscript for his classic The Waste Land between 1920 and 1922, and used only English spacing throughout: double-spaced sentences. [6] There is, however, considerable variability in the use of the terms, to the extent that they are often used with the meanings reversed.
A comprehensive style guide for general and academic use in Italy, Il Nuovo Manuale di Stile (2009), [18] does not address sentence spacing, but the Guida di Stile Italiano (2010), the official guide for Microsoft translation, tells users to use single sentence spacing "instead of the double spacing used in the United States". [19]
The 2002 study tested participants' reading speed for passages of on-screen text with single and double sentence spacing. The authors stated that "the 'double space group' consistently took longer time to finish than the 'single space' group" but concluded that "there was not enough evidence to suggest that a significant difference exists". [96]
A quasi-ordinal knowledge space is a knowledge space that is also closed under set intersection: if student a knows topics A and B; and student c knows topics B and C; then it is possible for another student b to know only topic B. A well-graded knowledge space or learning space is a knowledge space satisfying the following axiom:
Double space (English spacing). It is sometimes claimed that this convention stems from the use of the monospaced font on typewriters . [ 5 ] However, instructions to use more spacing between sentences than words date back centuries, and two spaces on a typewriter was the closest approximation to typesetters' previous rules aimed at improving ...
In his 1981 book Critical Path, futurist and inventor R. Buckminster Fuller estimated that if we took all the knowledge that mankind had accumulated and transmitted by the year One CE as equal to one unit of information, it probably took about 1500 years (or until the sixteenth century) for that amount of knowledge to double. The next doubling ...
There’s no going back. And that’s what I wanted for Cliteracy — you don’t have to like it, you don’t have to like the art or the message or the messenger — but once you have the facts and the information, you can’t give them back. You don’t have to do anything with the knowledge, but you can’t give it back.”
The history of knowledge's relevancy has coincided with the discussion of the academic term "knowledge society" as reflected in the need for knowledge management since the 1960s. [10] It has also coincided with the study of the digital revolution which is seen as part of a series of knowledge revolutions. [ 10 ]