Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Manual factor column: Enter the response factor that you want to use (see Figure 1 and Figure 2) Click Reprocess All to see the amount of the uncalibrated compound ; Figure 1: Compound table settings using a manual factor. Figure 2: Quantitation using a manual factor. Using a manual factor with an ISTD method If the compound amount is ...
by tom jupille » Tue Jul 08, 2014 7:53 pm. The response factor (RF) is the slope of the calibration line relating peak size (on the Y-axis) to the amount injected (on the X-axis). It is unique to a particular compound on a particular system on a particular day. The relative response factor (RRF), as one would expect from the name, is the ratio ...
The units used depend on the subsequent calculations used with the RF value. There are two ways that I have used to determine the RF: 1) Make two preparations and six measurements each and calculate the mean RF. 2) Make a calibration curve. The Slope of the curve is the RF.
Your CF makes no sense because there is no such function in Empower as AVE (Area). You need to specify as an intersample summary custom field functions like AVE, MAX, MIN etc using this syntax: Label.Injection.Channel.Summary Function (Field) so for example. A.%..AVE (Area) calculates the average area of peaks for all injections of samples ...
The curve is the response factor (RF): Figure 1. Calibration curve 1. Response, 2 Amount, 3 Response factor. Absolute component amount in the unknown sample = Response of the target component in the sample * RF * M * D . Where: The response of the target component is measured in the same units as the units used to calculate the RF (area or height)
Lanetl: If you mean assume a relative response factor of 1 against a known peak (such as the parent drug) then yes, until you know more about you're unkown then that's all you can do, but you should specify this when you quote your results, i.e quote '0.5% rRt 1.8 as Drug' or similar. This should work as long as you think you'r unknown is ...
I've been having trouble establishing response factors for external standards. The problem is, when my two standard curves have non-zero y-intercepts (which is always), I cannot establish a Response factor between the two substances except at specific concentrations, as the Response factor is specific to that concentration.
Even ICH guidelines clearly mentioned that Response factor must be calculated with ''drug substance'' only. Please find the below material from ICH Q3A. ''The study conducted to charectarize the structure of actual impurities present in the new drug substance at or above apperent level of 0.1% (Calculated by using the response factor of drug ...
by Alex Buske » Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:57 am. Hi, According to EP 2.2.46 RRFs have to be used, if relative responses are smaller 0.8 and greater 1.2. There can be reasons to use also relative response factors 0.8-1.2, especially if a impurity should be validated with narrow recovery limits (85-115%).
Conceptual: Response factors. WesleyCrozier. May 2011. <p>I'm relatively new to HPLC and response factors are giving me some trouble. My supervisor believes that a response factor can be created between any two compounds that absorb at the same wavelength and do not interefere with eachother. In practice, this does seem to be the case.