Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
[lower bound:upper bound] ¢ for computers with extended character sets ¢ or: (LOWER BOUND..UPPER BOUND) # FOR COMPUTERS WITH ONLY 6 BIT CHARACTERS. # Both bounds are inclusive and can be omitted, in which case they default to the declared array bounds. Neither the stride facility, nor diagonal slice aliases are part of the revised report ...
Similarly, a function g defined on domain D and having the same codomain (K, ≤) is an upper bound of f, if g(x) ≥ f (x) for each x in D. The function g is further said to be an upper bound of a set of functions, if it is an upper bound of each function in that set.
The element k is called an upper bound of S. The concepts of bounded below and lower bound are defined similarly. (See also upper and lower bounds.) A subset S of a partially ordered set P is called bounded if it has both an upper and a lower bound, or equivalently, if it is contained in an interval.
In this poset, 60 is an upper bound (though not a least upper bound) of the subset {,,,}, which does not have any lower bound (since 1 is not in the poset); on the other hand 2 is a lower bound of the subset of powers of 2, which does not have any upper bound. If the number 0 is included, this will be the greatest element, since this is a ...
• Length. The length is the number of evaluation points. Because the sets are disjoint for {, …,}, the length of the code is | | = (+). • Dimension. The dimension of the code is (+), for ≤ , as each has degree at most (()), covering a vector space of dimension (()) =, and by the construction of , there are + distinct .
In computer programming, bounds checking is any method of detecting whether a variable is within some bounds before it is used. It is usually used to ensure that a number fits into a given type (range checking), or that a variable being used as an array index is within the bounds of the array (index checking).
Using a naive lower bound and schoolbook matrix multiplication for the upper bound, one can straightforwardly conclude that 2 ≤ ω ≤ 3. Whether ω = 2 is a major open question in theoretical computer science, and there is a line of research developing matrix multiplication algorithms to get improved bounds on ω.
With more advanced techniques (Dudley's entropy bound and Haussler's upper bound [4]) one can show, for example, that there exists a constant , such that any class of {,}-indicator functions with Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension has Rademacher complexity upper-bounded by .