Ad
related to: vindicta vs ultio full case docket- Explore Pricing Plans
Affordable Law Software Plans
That Fit Your Firm’s Needs
- MyCase 10 Day Free Trial
No Credit Card Required
Get the Most Out of Your Software
- Start A MyCase Free Trial
Take Your Firm to the Next Level
Law Firm Efficiency Software
- Legal CRM Software
Seamless Client Intake.
Track Your Prospect Pipeline.
- Explore Pricing Plans
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Case Docket no. Question(s) presented Certiorari granted Oral argument A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools: 24-249: Whether the ADA and Rehabilitation Act require children with disabilities to satisfy a uniquely stringent "bad faith or gross misjudgment" standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education. January 17, 2025
Age is relevant in Miranda cases. Bullcoming v. New Mexico: 09-10876 [dead link ] 2011-06-23 A defendant's Confrontation Clause rights cover a non-testifying laboratory analyst whose supervisor testifies as to test results that the analyst transcribed from a machine. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association: 08-1448: 2011-06-27
J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873 (2011), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that a court may not exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that has not purposefully availed itself of doing business in the jurisdiction or placed goods in the stream of commerce in the expectation they would be purchased in the jurisdiction.
Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado (Docket 23-975) is a pending United States Supreme Court case about the scope of environmental review required for government agencies by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The public ceremony of manumissio vindicta ("by the rod") was a fictitious trial [131] that had to be performed before a magistrate who held imperium; a Roman citizen declared the slave free, the owner did not contest it, the citizen touched the slave with a staff and pronounced a formula, and the magistrate confirmed it. [132]
Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977) – The death penalty is unconstitutional for rape of an adult woman when the victim is not killed.; Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982) – The death penalty is unconstitutional for a person who is a minor participant in a felony and does not kill, attempt to kill, or intend to kill.
National Commissioner of The South African Police Service v Southern African Human Rights Litigation Centre and Another, sometimes known as the torture docket case, is a 2014 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on universal jurisdiction in international criminal law.
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: United States v. Erlinger, 77 F.4th 617 (7th Cir. 2023).: Questions presented; Whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant's prior convictions were "committed on occasions different from one another," as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act ...