Ad
related to: verified complaint for annulment alabama state department of revenue excise tax
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc. , 575 U.S. 21 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "the Eleventh Circuit properly concluded that CSX 's competitors are an appropriate comparison class for the Railroad Revitalization and Regulation Reform Act of 1976 's subsection (b)(4) claim."
A. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board; Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries; Alabama Commission on Higher Education; Alabama Cooperative Extension System
The governor also is commander-in-chief of the state's military forces, which consist of the Alabama Army National Guard and Alabama Air National Guard, which are part of the National Guard of the United States. As commander-in-chief, the governor may call out the state's military forces to preserve the public peace when it is not in active ...
The rule against foreign revenue enforcement, often abbreviated to the revenue rule, is a general legal principle that the courts of one country will not enforce the tax laws of another country. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] The rule is part of the conflict of laws rules developed at common law, and forms part of the act of state doctrine .
Service tax was introduced by Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 [5] and this also was added to the jurisdiction of CEGAT. Accordingly, the name of the Tribunal was changed to Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) by amending section 129 of the Customs Act, by section 119 of Finance Act, 2003, [6] effective from 14 May 2003.
An Alabama district judge who presides over cases in juvenile court, often involving child abuse or neglect, has been suspended after a state-led investigation that looked at hundreds of cases and ...
Holland was the director of another company which itself was the director of those companies, and the Revenue was the sole remaining creditor. It claimed Holland was liable under Insolvency Act 1986 section 212 to account for dividends as they were misapplied or Holland was guilty of misfeasance or breach of fiduciary duty, and for that Holland ...
Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case that overturned the peonage laws of Alabama. [1]The Supreme Court considered the validity of the Alabama state court's ruling that Alabama statute (§ 4730 of the Code of Alabama of 1896, as amended in 1903 and 1907) was constitutional.