When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ruchika Girhotra case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruchika_Girhotra_case

    On 22 December 2009, after 14 years, 40 adjournments, and more than 400 hearings, the court finally pronounced Rathore guilty under Section 354 IPC (molestation) and sentenced him to six months' imprisonment and a fine of Rs 1,000. The CBI had opposed Rathore's plea and had sought an enhancement of his sentence from six months to the maximum of ...

  3. Vishakha and others v. State of Rajasthan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vishakha_and_others_v...

    Women experiencing sexual harassment at workplace had to lodge a complaint under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code that deals with the 'criminal assault of women to outrage women's modesty' and Section 509 that punishes an individual or individuals for using a 'word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman'. These sections ...

  4. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Children...

    However, the IPC could not effectively protect the child due to various loopholes like: [citation needed] IPC 375 does not protect male victims or anyone from sexual acts of penetration other than "traditional" peno-vaginal intercourse. [13] IPC 354 lacks a statutory definition of "modesty". It carries a weak penalty and is a compoundable offence.

  5. Rupan Deol Bajaj case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupan_Deol_Bajaj_case

    On 20 August 1988, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana upheld Gill's conviction under Section 354 (outraging the modesty of a woman) and Section 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult a lady) for his action against Rupan Deol Bajaj . [1]

  6. Arnesh Kumar Guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnesh_Kumar_Guidelines

    In 2005, Section 498A IPC was upheld by the Supreme Court of India when it was challenged. [8] In 2010, the Supreme Court spoke about the misuse of anti-dowry laws in Preeti Gupta & Another v. State of Jharkhand & Another and more detailed investigation was recommended. [ 9 ]

  7. Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheduled_Caste_and...

    Section 3(2) contains four subsections with offences) Two derived offences (sections 3(2)(vi) and 3(2)(vii)). The derived offences only come into the picture when another offence under the Act has been committed. One subsection (Section 3(2)(v)) increases the punishment for certain offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

  8. Sexual harassment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment

    The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 introduced changes to the Indian Penal Code, making sexual harassment an expressed offense under Section 354 A, which is punishable up to three years of imprisonment and or with fine. The Amendment also introduced new sections making acts like disrobing a woman without consent, stalking and sexual acts by ...

  9. Eve teasing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eve_teasing

    The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 introduced changes to the Indian Penal Code, making sexual harassment an expressed offence under Section 354 A, which is punishable up to three years of imprisonment and or with fine.