When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: how to evaluate websites credibility list

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stanford Web Credibility Project - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_Web_Credibility...

    In their study, Experts vs. Online Consumers: A Comparative Credibility Study of Health and Finance Web Sites, fifteen health and finance experts were asked to assess the credibility of the same industry-specific sites as those reviewed by the Stanford PTL consumers. The Sliced Bread Design study revealed that health and finance experts were ...

  3. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    One university has started using the CRAAP test to help teach students about online content evaluation. In a 2017 article, Cara Berg, a reference librarian and co-coordinator of user education at William Paterson University emphasizes website evaluation as a tool for active research. [5]

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Here's a checklist to help organize your evaluation of a source. Remember, this checklist is useful to identify whether a source is likely to be appropriate for general use in an average article. No source is always unreliable for every statement, and no source is always reliable for any statement.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    a list of sources that have never been discussed, or whose reliability should be obvious to most editors; a list of primary, secondary, or tertiary sources; a list of independent or affiliated sources; a list of self-published or traditionally published sources; a representative sample of all sources used on Wikipedia or all sources in existence

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    There is an important exception to sourcing statements of fact or opinion: Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs and tweets as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the biographical material.

  7. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com/d?reason=invalid_cred

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Intelligence source and information reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_source_and...

    Insufficient information to evaluate reliability. May or may not be reliable. Information credibility. Rating Description 1: Confirmed by independent Sources

  1. Ad

    related to: how to evaluate websites credibility list