Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
During the colonial era, the British ruled the Gold Coast (which is now considered modern day Ghana) through indirect rule. [4] Under such a system, the chiefs upheld customary law, but did not have resources or power to uphold decisions if they faced opposition from their people, which made chiefs reliant on the British to help enforce their rulings. [4]
The original owner can obtain protection against the former owner through the doctrine of estoppel (see also, s 21(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 "unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller's authority to sell"). Methods of the estoppel can be by words, by conduct, or by negligence.
In regard to consumer contracts, the Sale of Goods Act 1979 was replaced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which covers contracts entered into from 1 October 2015. [9] The earlier legislation, which continues in respect of business-to-business transactions, was: The Sale of Goods Act 1893 (56 & 57 Vict. c. 71) The Sale of Goods Act 1979 (c. 54)
Ministry of Trade and Industry (MOTI) is a government ministry of Ghana, headquartered in Accra. [1]The Minister for Trade and Industry is the Ghana government official responsible for running the ministry.
Ghana Union of Traders Association (GUTA) is the umbrella body that regulates the activities of trades in Ghana. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The body also lobbies the Government of Ghana on issues that affect traders in the country.
1962 crimes in Ghana (1 P) D. 1962 disasters in Ghana (1 P) S. 1962 in Ghanaian sport (1 P) This page was last edited on 20 July 2024, at 04:58 (UTC). Text is ...
The bill could jeopardise $3.8 billion in World Bank financing for Ghana over the next five to six years if it becomes law, derailing a $3 billion IMF loan package, according to the finance ministry.
A patent according to section 1 of the Patent Act, is the right to protect an invention. [15] In the Massachusetts Circuit Court ruling in the patent case of Davoll et al. v. Brown, Justice Charles L. Woodbury wrote that "only in this way can we protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests are as much a man's own...as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks ...