Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Court, applying the decision of the House of Lords in R. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd. (1981), [1] held that the test for standing was whether the applicant had a sufficient interest in the subject matter, and not whether he or she had a specific legal right.
In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. A party has standing in the following situations:
Important to note here is that “Transcendental” does not refer to knowing the unknowable, but rather it refers to the a priori intellectual conditions for experience. This intuition of the a priori understanding is a modern elucidation of the postmodern expression "always already": [ 9 ] time and space always and already determine the ...
[4] [5] [6] In ordinary English (also natural language) "necessary" and "sufficient" indicate relations between conditions or states of affairs, not statements. For example, being a man is a necessary condition for being a brother, but it is not sufficient—while being a man sibling is a necessary and sufficient condition for being a brother.
Students who are exhausted or in ill health cannot learn much. If they are distracted by outside responsibilities, interests, or worries, have overcrowded schedules, or other unresolved issues, students may have little interest in learning. For example, we may identify the situation of an academic examination of a school, in which the cause of ...
In equilibrium Z=D. D can be decomposed as D 1 +D 2 where D 1 is the propensity to consume, which may be written C(Y) or χ(N). D 2 is explained as 'the volume of investment', and the equilibrium condition determining the level of employment is that D 1 +D 2 should equal Z as functions of N. D 2 can be identified with I (r).
The concept is due to Sir Ronald Fisher in 1920. [2] Stephen Stigler noted in 1973 that the concept of sufficiency had fallen out of favor in descriptive statistics because of the strong dependence on an assumption of the distributional form (see Pitman–Koopman–Darmois theorem below), but remained very important in theoretical work. [3]
[37] Land owned by Native Americans decreased from 138 million acres (560,000 km 2) in 1887 to 48 million acres (190,000 km 2) in 1934. [38] Senator Henry M. Teller of Colorado was one of the most outspoken opponents of allotment. In 1881, he said that allotment was a policy "to despoil the Indians of their lands and to make them vagabonds on ...