Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A matrix is in reduced row echelon form if it is in row echelon form, with the additional property that the first nonzero entry of each row is equal to and is the only nonzero entry of its column. The reduced row echelon form of a matrix is unique and does not depend on the sequence of elementary row operations used to obtain it.
Using row operations to convert a matrix into reduced row echelon form is sometimes called Gauss–Jordan elimination. In this case, the term Gaussian elimination refers to the process until it has reached its upper triangular, or (unreduced) row echelon form. For computational reasons, when solving systems of linear equations, it is sometimes ...
In practice, we can construct one specific rank factorization as follows: we can compute , the reduced row echelon form of .Then is obtained by removing from all non-pivot columns (which can be determined by looking for columns in which do not contain a pivot), and is obtained by eliminating any all-zero rows of .
The rank is equal to the number of pivots in the reduced row echelon form, and is the maximum number of linearly independent columns that can be chosen from the matrix. For example, the 4 × 4 matrix in the example above has rank three.
A variant called rook pivoting at each step involves search of maximum element the way rook moves on a chessboard, along column, row, column again and so on till reaching a pivot maximal in both its row and column. It can be proven that for large matrices of random elements its cost of operations at each step is similarly to partial pivoting ...
A common approach to finding the rank of a matrix is to reduce it to a simpler form, generally row echelon form, by elementary row operations. Row operations do not change the row space (hence do not change the row rank), and, being invertible, map the column space to an isomorphic space (hence do not change the column rank).
Note that and are two distinct matrices in the row echelon form, which would mean that their span is the same if they're treated as matrices over some field. Moreover, they're in the Hermite normal form , meaning that their row span is also the same if they're considered over Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} } , the ring of integers .
By computing the matrix and reducing it to reduced row echelon form and then easily reading off a basis for the null space, we may find a basis for the Berlekamp subalgebra and hence construct polynomials () in it. We then need to successively compute GCDs of the form above until we find a non-trivial factor.