Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Change of variables is an operation that is related to substitution. However these are different operations, as can be seen when considering differentiation or integration (integration by substitution). A very simple example of a useful variable change can be seen in the problem of finding the roots of the sixth-degree polynomial:
Considering mathematics as a formal language, a variable is a symbol from an alphabet, usually a letter like x, y, and z, which denotes a range of possible values. [7] If a variable is free in a given expression or formula, then it can be replaced with any of the values in its range. [8] Certain kinds of bound variables can be substituted too.
The value function of an optimization problem gives the value attained by the objective function at a solution, while only depending on the parameters of the problem. [1] [2] In a controlled dynamical system, the value function represents the optimal payoff of the system over the interval [t, t 1] when started at the time-t state variable x(t)=x. [3]
In computer programming, the term free variable refers to variables used in a function that are neither local variables nor parameters of that function. The term non-local variable is often a synonym in this context. An instance of a variable symbol is bound, in contrast, if the value of that variable symbol has been bound to a specific value ...
(Here, "live" means that the value is used along some path that begins at the Φ function in question.) If a variable is not live, the result of the Φ function cannot be used and the assignment by the Φ function is dead. Construction of pruned SSA form uses live-variable information in the Φ function insertion phase to decide whether a given ...
In mathematics and economics, the envelope theorem is a major result about the differentiability properties of the value function of a parameterized optimization problem. [1]
The Hamiltonian is a function used to solve a problem of optimal control for a dynamical system.It can be understood as an instantaneous increment of the Lagrangian expression of the problem that is to be optimized over a certain time period. [1]
The Vitali covering lemma is vital to the proof of this theorem; its role lies in proving the estimate for the Hardy–Littlewood maximal function.. The theorem also holds if balls are replaced, in the definition of the derivative, by families of sets with diameter tending to zero satisfying the Lebesgue's regularity condition, defined above as family of sets with bounded eccentricity.