When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Names of large numbers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_large_numbers

    The naming procedure for large numbers is based on taking the number n occurring in 10 3n+3 (short scale) or 10 6n (long scale) and concatenating Latin roots for its units, tens, and hundreds place, together with the suffix -illion. In this way, numbers up to 10 3·999+3 = 10 3000 (short scale) or 10 6·999 = 10 5994 (long scale

  3. Large numbers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_numbers

    The number of cells in the human body (estimated at 3.72 × 10 13), or 37.2 trillion/37.2 T [3] The number of bits on a computer hard disk (as of 2024, typically about 10 13, 1–2 TB), or 10 trillion/10T; The number of neuronal connections in the human brain (estimated at 10 14), or 100 trillion/100 T

  4. Googol - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol

    The decay time for a supermassive black hole of roughly 1 galaxy-mass (10 11 solar masses) due to Hawking radiation is on the order of 10 100 years. [7] Therefore, the heat death of an expanding universe is lower-bounded to occur at least one googol years in the future. A googol is considerably smaller than a centillion. [8]

  5. -yllion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/-yllion

    -yllion (pronounced / aɪ lj ən /) [1] is a proposal from Donald Knuth for the terminology and symbols of an alternate decimal superbase [clarification needed] system. In it, he adapts the familiar English terms for large numbers to provide a systematic set of names for much larger numbers.

  6. Talk:Centillion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Centillion

    Its seems, based on this article, that a centillion is more than everything but less than infinity. Sean7phil 19:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC) "The total number of atoms (or even subatomic particles) in the entire universe does not even come near to either value of a centillion." A sourceless claim, unprovable at this time, and irrelevant.

  7. Googolplex - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googolplex

    Sagan gave an example that if the entire volume of the observable universe is filled with fine dust particles roughly 1.5 micrometers in size (0.0015 millimeters), then the number of different combinations in which the particles could be arranged and numbered would be about one googolplex.

  8. Template:Number to word - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Number_to_word

    Converts a given integer into a cardinal number or ordinal number in the English language. Anything between 10 126 and -10 126 is supported, as well as some larger numbers such as one centillion and one millinillion.

  9. Orders of magnitude (numbers) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(numbers)

    1/52! chance of a specific shuffle Mathematics: The chances of shuffling a standard 52-card deck in any specific order is around 1.24 × 10 −68 (or exactly 1 ⁄ 52!) [4] Computing: The number 1.4 × 10 −45 is approximately equal to the smallest positive non-zero value that can be represented by a single-precision IEEE floating-point value.