Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In predictive analytics, a table of confusion (sometimes also called a confusion matrix) is a table with two rows and two columns that reports the number of true positives, false negatives, false positives, and true negatives. This allows more detailed analysis than simply observing the proportion of correct classifications (accuracy).
log(Diagnostic Odds Ratio) for varying sensitivity and specificity. In medical testing with binary classification, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) is a measure of the effectiveness of a diagnostic test. [1]
The four outcomes can be formulated in a 2×2 contingency table or confusion matrix, ... MedCalc Free Online Calculator; Bayesian clinical diagnostic model applet
A profiling system results in the following confusion matrix: Predicted class. Actual class. Fail Pass Sum Fail 10: 0: 10 Pass 990: 999000: 999990 Sum 1000: 999000: ...
Precision and recall. In statistical analysis of binary classification and information retrieval systems, the F-score or F-measure is a measure of predictive performance. It is calculated from the precision and recall of the test, where the precision is the number of true positive results divided by the number of all samples predicted to be positive, including those not identified correctly ...
Confusion matrix; Pivot table, in spreadsheet software, cross-tabulates sampling data with counts (contingency table) and/or sums. TPL Tables is a tool for generating and printing crosstabs. The iterative proportional fitting procedure essentially manipulates contingency tables to match altered joint distributions or marginal sums.
These can be arranged into a 2×2 contingency table (confusion matrix), conventionally with the test result on the vertical axis and the actual condition on the horizontal axis. These numbers can then be totaled, yielding both a grand total and marginal totals. Totaling the entire table, the number of true positives, false negatives, true ...
The resulting number gives an estimate on how many positive examples the feature could correctly identify within the data, with higher numbers meaning that the feature could correctly classify more positive samples. Below is an example of how to use the metric when the full confusion matrix of a certain feature is given: Feature A Confusion Matrix