Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
{{{1}}} word to be used {{{2}}}, positioning of the line and label: Add top for the line to be above label; Add left for the label to be in the left margin, and no break in the text (recommended for continuous text) Leave blank or write bottom for the line to be below the label {{{label}}}, prefixing word, default word is page, or label= to ...
Held that state taxpayers do not have standing to challenge to state tax laws in federal court. 9–0 Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent ...
Note that legislation can impose shorter time limits while a court may hold that an application made in less than three months may still be not prompt enough. The applicant must have a sufficient interest in the matter to which the application relates. [4]: s. 31(3) This requirement is also known as standing (or “locus standi”).
However, the United Kingdom courts gradually adopted a single sufficient interest test for all prerogative orders. [13] In R. v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise, ex parte Cook (1969), [14] for example, the High Court used a sufficient interest test to determine whether an applicant had standing to apply for a mandatory order. [15]
In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have, by demonstrating to the court, sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. A party has standing in the following situations:
The High Court held that the WDM had a sufficient interest, and that too much money was spent on the dam. Rose LJ said the following: factors of significance in the present case: the importance of vindicating the rule of law... the importance of the issue raised... the likely absence of any other responsible challenger... the nature of the breach of duty... the prominent role of these ...
OP-ED: Given the confusion among many courts as to how the foreclosure process works with regard to GSE loans, the decision in "Capital One v. Peck" should be helpful.
This page in a nutshell: An article too short and incomplete to provide more than rudimentary information about a subject should be marked as a stub by adding an appropriate stub template to the end of the article. Anyone can edit a stub article, or remove a stub template from an article which is no longer a stub.