When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. Forensic psychiatry - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_psychiatry

   Forensic psychiatry is a subspeciality of psychiatry and is related to criminology. [1] It encompasses the interface between law and psychiatry. According to the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, it is defined as "a subspecialty of psychiatry in which scientific and clinical expertise is applied in legal contexts involving civil, criminal, correctional, regulatory, or legislative ...

3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental health

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

   Also, permitted the courts to defer judgment regarding a person's need for commitment, to the doctor(s) 14th 1979 Parham v. J.R. The Court ruled that minors may be civilly committed to mental health facilities without an adversary hearing; in essence, parents do have the right to commit their children. 14th 1982 Youngberg v. Romeo

4. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

   In such a case, he is involuntarily committed until his competency is restored. [1] The Supreme Court has ruled that the government has a legitimate interest in bringing defendants to trial and that therefore incompetent defendants can be forcibly medicated under certain circumstances. See Sell v. United States.

5. Forensic psychotherapy - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_psychotherapy

   An individual that has specialized knowledge in regards to mental health, as well as the legal system, proves to be a vital asset for the courts and the criminal justice system. Many forensic psychologists spend a significant portion of time working in legal settings, but there are a lot of other locations in which a forensic psychologist can ...

6. Adult or children's court? Psychologist discusses mental ...

   www.aol.com/news/adult-childrens-court...

   For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

7. Barefoot v. Estelle - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barefoot_v._Estelle

   Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case. [1] The Court ruled on the admissibility of clinical opinions given by two psychiatrists hired by the prosecution in answer to hypothetical questions regarding the defendant's future dangerousness and the likelihood that he would present a continuing threat to society in this Texas death penalty case.