When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. County of Riverside v. McLaughlin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Riverside_v...

    County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which involved the question of within what period of time must a suspect arrested without a warrant (warrantless arrests) be brought into court to determine if there is probable cause for holding the suspect in custody.

  3. Speech Recognition Firm Founders Lernout and Hauspie ...

    www.aol.com/news/2010-09-21-lernout-hauspie...

    A Belgian court convicted the founders of the once high-flying speech recognition software company Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products of fraud, writing the final chapter in the story of a company ...

  4. Lernout & Hauspie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lernout_&_Hauspie

    Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products (L&H) was a Belgium-based speech recognition technology company, founded by Jo Lernout and Pol Hauspie, that went bankrupt in 2001 because of a fraud engineered by the management

  5. Category : United States commercial speech case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  6. Therapy clinic accused of $700K Medicaid fraud. Tri-Cities ...

    www.aol.com/therapy-clinic-accused-700k-medicaid...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Kurt Donsbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Donsbach

    Kurt Walter Donsbach (December 1, 1935 – August 29, 2021) [1] was a convicted felon and controversial alternative medicine figure who was twice convicted of practicing medicine without a license.

  8. But during Santeiro’s sentencing hearing in July 2022, Vora-Puglisi argued the physician was unaware of the fraud committed by the other defendants convicted in the sober homes case and said ...

  9. Lane v. Franks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lane_v._Franks

    Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving public employee's freedom of speech rights. Edward Lane sued Steve Franks for unfairly firing him, out of retaliation for sworn testimony Lane gave during a federal fraud case. [1]