When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Least-upper-bound property - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least-upper-bound_property

    A real number x is the least upper bound (or supremum) for S if x is an upper bound for S and x ≤ y for every upper bound y of S. The least-upper-bound property states that any non-empty set of real numbers that has an upper bound must have a least upper bound in real numbers .

  3. Infimum and supremum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infimum_and_supremum

    Then has an upper bound (, for example, or ) but no least upper bound in : If we suppose is the least upper bound, a contradiction is immediately deduced because between any two reals and (including and ) there exists some rational , which itself would have to be the least upper bound (if >) or a member of greater than (if <).

  4. List of real analysis topics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_real_analysis_topics

    Convolution. Cauchy product –is the discrete convolution of two sequences; Farey sequence – the sequence of completely reduced fractions between 0 and 1; Oscillation – is the behaviour of a sequence of real numbers or a real-valued function, which does not converge, but also does not diverge to +∞ or −∞; and is also a quantitative measure for that.

  5. Monotone convergence theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotone_convergence_theorem

    In its simplest form, it says that a non-decreasing bounded-above sequence of real numbers ... converges to its smallest upper bound, its supremum. Likewise, a non-increasing bounded-below sequence converges to its largest lower bound, its infimum. In particular, infinite sums of non-negative numbers converge to the supremum of the partial sums ...

  6. Extreme value theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_value_theorem

    Proof of the Extreme Value Theorem. By the boundedness theorem, f is bounded from above, hence, by the Dedekind-completeness of the real numbers, the least upper bound (supremum) M of f exists. It is necessary to find a point d in [a, b] such that M = f(d). Let n be a natural number. As M is the least upper bound, M – 1/n is not an upper ...

  7. Join and meet - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join_and_meet

    If (,) is a partially ordered set, such that each pair of elements in has a meet, then indeed = if and only if , since in the latter case indeed is a lower bound of , and since is the greatest lower bound if and only if it is a lower bound. Thus, the partial order defined by the meet in the universal algebra approach coincides with the original ...

  8. Construction of the real numbers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_real...

    An axiomatic definition of the real numbers consists of defining them as the elements of a complete ordered field. [2] [3] [4] This means the following: The real numbers form a set, commonly denoted , containing two distinguished elements denoted 0 and 1, and on which are defined two binary operations and one binary relation; the operations are called addition and multiplication of real ...

  9. Completeness (order theory) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completeness_(order_theory)

    The seldom-considered dual notion to a dcpo is the filtered-complete poset. Dcpos with a least element ("pointed dcpos") are one of the possible meanings of the phrase complete partial order (cpo). If every subset that has some upper bound has also a least upper bound, then the respective poset is called bounded complete. The term is used ...