When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: what are summary conviction offences cases in california free trial

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Summary offence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_offence

    The Melbourne Magistrates' Court.In Victoria, Australia, all summary offences are heard in the Magistrates' Court. A summary offence or petty offence is a violation in some common law jurisdictions that can be proceeded against summarily, [1] [2] [3] without the right to a jury trial and/or indictment (required for an indictable offence).

  3. Summary jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_jurisdiction

    In the case of offences primarily punishable only on summary conviction, the accused, if the maximum punishment is imprisonment for over three months, can choose a jury trial (Summary Jurisdiction Act 1879, s. 17). In the case of offences primarily punishable only on indictment, power to convict summarily is given in the following cases:

  4. Summary (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_(law)

    Summary conviction, convicting an accused without giving him the benefit of a jury trial and/or indictment. Summary court-martial, the lowest in the rank of courts-martial, conducted before one commissioned officer, limited in jurisdiction to offenses of a minor or petty nature of which enlisted men, not commissioned officers, stand accused.

  5. California criminal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_criminal_law

    California Penal Code section 15 defines a "crime" or "public offense" as "an act committed or omitted in violation of a law forbidding or commanding it, and to which is annexed, upon conviction, any of the following punishments: Death; Imprisonment; Fine; Removal from office; or,

  6. Lockyer v. Andrade - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockyer_v._Andrade

    Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.

  7. ‘This is not an honor we wanted’: Placer case was first ...

    www.aol.com/news/not-honor-wanted-placer-case...

    Placer County District Attorney Morgan Gire, along with local and state officials, gathered for a news conference Tuesday shortly after Nathaniel Evan Cabacungan was sentenced to prison as the ...