Ad
related to: impact factor lancet oncology report format
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (paediatrics) launched in 2017. According to the Journal Citation Reports, The Lancet Oncology had a 2021 impact factor of 54.433, The Lancet Neurology had 59.935, and The Lancet Infectious Diseases had 71.421. [8] There is also an online website for students entitled The Lancet Student in blog format ...
The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly mean number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal, as indexed by Clarivate's Web of Science.
Oncology Reports is a peer-reviewed medical journal of oncology published monthly by Spandidos Publications. ... the journal has a 2021 impact factor of 4.136. [1 ...
Oncology Letters is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal covering all aspects of oncology. It was established in 2010 and is published by Spandidos Publications ...
The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. For example, the JCR also includes a five-year impact factor, which is calculated by dividing the number of citations to the journal in a given year by the number of articles published in that journal in the previous five years. [14] [15]
Journal ranking is widely used in academic circles in the evaluation of an academic journal's impact and quality. Journal rankings are intended to reflect the place of a journal within its field, the relative difficulty of being published in that journal, and the prestige associated with it.
MIAMI — A proposal from the power conferences stands to potentially remake the NCAA governance and championship structure, shifting more authority to the power leagues over rule-making, policy ...
Scopus is a scientific abstract and citation database, launched by the academic publisher Elsevier as a competitor to older Web of Science in 2004. [1] An ensuing competition between the two databases has been characterized as "intense" and is considered to significantly benefit their users in terms of continuous improvent in coverage, search/analysis capabilities, but not in price.