When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Addington v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addington_v._Texas

    Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that set the standard for involuntary commitment for treatment by raising the burden of proof required to commit persons for psychiatric treatment from the usual civil burden of proof of "preponderance of the evidence" to "clear and convincing evidence".

  3. Moore v. Texas (2017) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Texas_(2017)

    Moore v. Texas, 137 S. Ct. 1039 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court decision about the death penalty and intellectual disability.The court held that contemporary clinical standards determine what an intellectual disability is, and held that even milder forms of intellectual disability may bar a person from being sentenced to death due to the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel ...

  4. Smith v. Allwright - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Allwright

    Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court with regard to voting rights and, by extension, racial desegregation.It overturned the Texas state law that authorized parties to set their internal rules, including the use of white primaries.

  5. Hopwood v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopwood_v._Texas

    The court held that "the University of Texas School of Law may not use race as a factor in deciding which applicants to admit in order to achieve a diverse student body, to combat the perceived effects of a hostile environment at the law school, to alleviate the law school's poor reputation in the minority community, or to eliminate any present ...

  6. Moody v. NetChoice, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_v._NetChoice,_LLC

    Moody and Paxton were challenges to two state statutes – enacted in Florida and Texas, respectively – that sought to limit this moderation. In July 2024, the justices vacated the lower-court decisions in both cases due to both courts failing to perform a full First Amendment assessment of the laws, and remanded them for further consideration.

  7. Two more Texas wins in court: sweeping small business ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-more-texas-wins-court-182900407.html

    Texas law requires that parents must consent to their child’s medical care. With weeks left in the Biden administration, HHS conceded it will not “enforce the challenged regulation in Texas ...

  8. Medicare Advantage disenrollment

    www.aol.com/medicare-advantage-disenrollment...

    Disenrollment is not required in these cases, as private medical insurance companies administer Medigap plans, and as such, are held separately to original Medicare. The best time to sign up for a ...

  9. Adams v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adams_v._Texas

    Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held on an 8–1 vote that, consistent with its prior opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois , a Texas requirement that jurors swear an oath that the mandatory imposition of a death sentence would not interfere with their consideration of factual matters such as ...