Ad
related to: sc appellate court cases examples summarylegal.thomsonreuters.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
- Legal Cases
Quickly Find On-Point Cases that
Address Your Specific Legal Issue.
- Start Your Free Trial
Access a Free Trial of Westlaw
Precision to Research Faster.
- New Features
View First-of-Their-Kind Tools to
More Efficiently Conduct Research.
- Explore Westlaw Precision
The Latest Evolution in Legal
Research. Speed Meets Precision.
- Legal Cases
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Court of Appeals hears most appeals from the Circuit Courts and Family Courts of South Carolina that do not fall within the seven classes of cases over which the South Carolina Supreme Court exercises exclusive jurisdiction. [1] Those seven classes are cases involving the death penalty, public utility rates, significant constitutional issues,
At the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, arguments were held regarding the racial makeup of the 1st, 2nd and 5th districts. The plaintiffs asserted that the predominant factor in the adoption of the current district maps was race for all three districts, while the defendants asserted that party affiliation was the main factor during the redistricting process of ...
Every year, each of the thirteen United States courts of appeals decides hundreds of cases. Of those, a few are so important that they later become models for decisions of other circuits, and of the United States Supreme Court, while others are noted for being dramatically rejected by the Supreme Court on appeal.
The certification of the appeal, one of two filed by Murdaugh, means that the case will go directly before the South Carolina Supreme Court, bypassing a lengthy process before the Court of Appeals.
A panel of three U.S. District judges ruled the coastal 1st District, represented by Republican Nancy Mace, is an unlawful racial gerrymander and that elections in the district must cease until ...
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the "total takings" test for evaluating whether a particular regulatory action constitutes a regulatory taking that requires compensation.
The appeals court ruled a new map must be drawn within 30 days of a Supreme Court ruling. But no ruling has come, forcing the appeals court to allow the map they deemed unconstitutional to stand ...
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) Set the standard for what parties must establish in evidence to be granted summary judgement in federal civil cases and how courts should evaluate those motions. Since such motions are extremely common, Anderson has become the most-cited Supreme Court case. Daubert v.