When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: sac court 10 step divorce

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sacramento County Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacramento_County_Superior...

    Pursuant to California Government Code § 68070 and the Judicial Council California Rules of Court § 10.613, the Sacramento County Superior Court has adopted Local Rules for its government and the government of its officers.

  3. Sacramento County Public Law Library - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacramento_County_Public...

    In 2008 the Sacramento County Superior Court received a grant to help fund a civil self-help center to assist self-represented litigants with general civil matters. [15] The Civil Self Help Center (CSHC) began as a joint project between the Sacramento Superior Court, the VLSP of Northern California (now known as Capital Pro Bono), and the ...

  4. Superior Court of California of the County of Sacramento

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Superior_Court_of...

    Superior Court of California of the County of Sacramento. Add languages. Add links. Article; Talk; English. ... Sacramento County Superior Court; Retrieved from ...

  5. ‘Incredibly prejudicial.’ Why Sacramento courts have caged ...

    www.aol.com/news/incredibly-prejudicial-why...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Diversity in the courts: Newest Sacramento judge represents ...

    www.aol.com/diversity-courts-newest-sacramento...

    Nearly 9% of California’s judges identify as Black or African-American, up from 4.6% in 2006.

  7. California superior courts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Superior_Courts

    Superior Court (that is, the superior court is the respondent on appeal), and the real opponent is then listed below those names as the "real party in interest". This is why several U.S. Supreme Court decisions in cases that originated in California bear names like Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court (1987) and Burnham v.