When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: arguing in a circle example worksheet answers printable free

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Circular reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning

    Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; [1] also known as circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. [2] Circular reasoning is not a formal logical fallacy, but a pragmatic defect in an argument whereby the premises are just as much in need of proof or ...

  3. Begging the question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

    When the fallacy of begging the question is committed in more than one step, some authors dub it circulus in probando ' reasoning in a circle ', [14] [22] or more commonly, circular reasoning. Begging the question is not considered a formal fallacy (an argument that is defective because it uses an incorrect deductive step ).

  4. Cartesian circle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_circle

    The Cartesian circle (also known as Arnauld's circle [1]) is an example of fallacious circular reasoning attributed to French philosopher René Descartes. He argued that the existence of God is proven by reliable perception , which is itself guaranteed by God.

  5. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    An example is a probabilistically valid instance of the formally invalid argument form of denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent. [ 12 ] Thus, "fallacious arguments usually have the deceptive appearance of being good arguments, [ 13 ] because for most fallacious instances of an argument form, a similar but non-fallacious instance ...

  6. Loaded question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

    A loaded question is a form of complex question that contains a controversial assumption (e.g., a presumption of guilt). [1]Such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. [2]

  7. Argumentation scheme - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_scheme

    Argument evaluation is the determination of the goodness of the argument: determining how good the argument is and whether, or with what reservations, it ought to be accepted. As mentioned above, in schemes accompanied by critical questions , a measure of the goodness of the argument is whether the critical questions can be appropriately answered.

  8. They were arguing over a boil-water notice, Florida police ...

    www.aol.com/news/were-arguing-over-boil-water...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Euler diagram - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_diagram

    For example, connectedness of zones might be enforced, or concurrency of curves or multiple points might be banned, as might tangential intersection of curves. In the adjacent diagram, examples of small Venn diagrams are transformed into Euler diagrams by sequences of transformations; some of the intermediate diagrams have concurrency of curves.