Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The English Wikipedia community has been following recent events in the Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation legal case with trepidation. In a world where many players would like to control the content of Wikipedia articles, we consider that protecting editor anonymity is essential to maintaining an encyclopedia that is comprehensive, reliable and neutral.
Users generally retire due to either a loss of interest in contributing to Wikipedia, out of necessity due to personal reasons, or a combination of those factors. Personal reasons for retiring may include starting a new job, going off to university or college or otherwise experiencing a life-changing event that will no longer allow the person ...
A 2014 trend analysis published in The Economist stated that "The number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years." [25] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was described by The Economist as substantially higher than in other (non-English Wikipedias).
Social researchers have published cherry picked selection of those messages then by confirmation bias equate the entire social group as a biased hateful social group. In turn, the publications of said social researchers are used as quality sources to mischaracterize the social group Wikipedia page. That slant gets repeated in the media. A ...
[100] Other Wikipedia editors and users on social media opposed the deletion of the article. [101] The article's deletion nomination received considerable attention from conservative media. [102] The Heritage Foundation, an American conservative think tank, called the arguments made in favor of deletion "absurd and ahistorical". [102]
Research shows that increase social media use and exposure to social media platforms can lead to negative results and bullying over time. [125] While social media's main intention is to share information and communicate with friends and family, there is more evidence pertaining to negative factors rather than positive ones.
When you lost hold of the primacy of good writing, moved over towards being a social media site, and (especially) when the value of the FA process was lost, you lost me. So many of the policies now seem meaningless or even counterproductive; the one that I think sticks is this one .
I have read the Wikipedia page, and it seems careful and balanced. Therefore, attempts to remove it can only be ideologically motivated – to whitewash Communism". [59] Other Wikipedia editors and users on social media opposed the deletion of the article. [60] The article's deletion nomination received considerable attention from conservative ...