Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case about government seizure of property for unpaid taxes, when the value of the property seized is greater than the tax debt. A unanimous court held that the surplus value is protected by the Fifth Amendment 's Takings Clause.
The U.S. Supreme Court dealt land banks a defeat in May with a unanimous ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County, in which a Minnesota woman argued that the government took more than her back tax bill ...
In the Minnesota case, which justices overturned unanimously on appeal, Hennepin County had foreclosed on Geraldine Tyler's condo because she owed $15,000 in property taxes and other associated costs.
It is common to refer to the "district courts" in the plural, as if each court in each judicial district is a separate court; this is the usage found in Chapter 484 of the Minnesota Statutes, which governs the jurisdiction, powers, procedure, organization, and operations of the district court. [3] However, the Minnesota Constitution only refers ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Lochner era was a period in American legal history from 1897 to 1937 in which the Supreme Court of the United States is said to have made it a common practice "to strike down economic regulations adopted by a State based on the Court's own notions of the most appropriate means for the State to implement its considered policies". [1]
U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the "total takings" test for evaluating whether a particular regulatory action constitutes a regulatory taking that requires compensation. [1]
Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty announced in a Monday press conference her office supports the exoneration of a man who was convicted of murdering an 18-year-old man more than a decade ago.