Ad
related to: how to identify unreliable websites for research topics essay template word
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The medium is not the message; source evaluation is an evaluation of content, not publication format. Sometimes high-quality, generally tertiary individual sources are also primary or secondary sources for some material. Two examples are etymological research that is the original work of a dictionary's staff (primary); and analytical not just regurgitative material in a topical encycl
This template is used in articles to identify sentences or short passages with information or analysis that has one or more inline citations but which are to insufficiently reliable sources. It produces the super-scripted text "better source needed". Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Reason reason A ...
This template allows editors to tweak search strings to find the best match for the subject; see the documentation for details. Alternatively, users who desire more freedom can use the meta-template {{find sources multi}}, which allows a choice of search engines. Example of {{find sources}}:
In a 2017 article, Cara Berg, a reference librarian and co-coordinator of user education at William Paterson University emphasizes website evaluation as a tool for active research. [5] At Berg's university, for example, library instruction is given to roughly 300 different classes, each in different subjects that require some type of research ...
Any publication with a fringe topic in its name should be treated with caution: most only serve to promote that topic and are not reliable sources for anything other than their own viewpoint. Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly , Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine , and Homeopathy .
A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.
If a large majority of sources are adamantly, confidently wrong, then we, as chroniclers of consensus, may have no option but to reflect that. This is a dicey topic. Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth has been downgraded from policy to partial policy to essay, while at the same time words vaguely reflecting it remain in Wikipedia:Verifiability.
This essay has been created to help readers assess the reliability of articles. It should be noted that this essay cannot be used to prove any particular article should be considered highly reliable; the Wikipedia:General disclaimer still applies. The table below is an overview of reliability indicators.