Ad
related to: trade dress infringement cases
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
One year later, Taco Cabana sued Two Pesos in federal district court for trade dress infringement under the Lanham Act and for theft of trade secrets under Texas common law. [10] Both the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit agreed that Two Pesos deliberately infringed upon Taco Cabana's trade dress, and ...
Federal Trademark Act of 1870 Infringement requires a likelihood of misleading purchasers, not exact similitude; with laches, a court may deny past damages but still enjoin future infringement where infringement is clear. In re Trade-Mark Cases: 100 U.S. 82: 1879: 9–0: Substantive: Constitutional basis for trademark regulation: Majority ...
Duracraft precluded Vornado from relitigating its trade dress claim. Additionally, it rejected Vornado's argument that an intervening Federal Circuit case, [3] which disagreed with the 10th Circuit's reasoning in the Duracraft case, constituted a change in the law of trade dress that warranted relitigation of Vornado's trade-dress claim.
In May 2015, the Federal Circuit affirmed parts of the jury's verdict at the District Court, but vacated a percentage of the dollar amount pertaining to trade dress infringement and dilution. [58] This decision was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. In December 2016, the Supreme Court decided 8–0 to reverse the decision from ...
Trade dress can be protected as getup under the law of passing off in the UK. Passing off is a common law remedy for protecting an unregistered trade mark. [3] Getup, packaging, business strategy, marketing techniques, advertisement themes etc. can also be protected under passing off.
Pages in category "United States trade dress case law" The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. T.
Two influencers have entered a legal battle over a beige aesthetic on social media that began when one creator accused another of mimicking her vibe online
The Supreme Court first recognized the doctrine of contributory infringement in 1924, in William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co. [8] [9] In this case, the salesmen for the defendant, a manufacturer, suggested to retail dealers that defendant's product could be imperceptibly substituted for the plaintiff's product. [8]