Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An action to enforce townhome covenants is, in fact, a legal or equitable action on a contract or written instrument—and so any enforcement action must be brought within five years.
The HOA's governing documents generally "run with the land", which means that all current and future owners of property within the HOA will be bound by them as a condition of property ownership. They usually include: The covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) of the subdivision. These are likely the most important documents affecting ...
"Covenants, conditions, and restrictions," commonly abbreviated "CC&Rs" or "CCRs", are a complicated system of covenants, known generically as "deed restrictions", built into the deeds of all the lots [21] in a common interest development, particularly in the tens of millions of American homes governed by a homeowner association (HOA) or ...
There are five basic conditions that must be met in order for there to be an effective real covenant and equitable servitude: It must be enforceable . To be enforceable it must not be too vague, it must not violate a statute or the constitution , it must not violate public policy, and it must meet the requirements under the statute of frauds .
HOA board members and homeowners have responsibilities. Check over the laws to make sure they’re being followed.
To create new rules or enforce current rules, the HOA’s board must meet and come to a consensus with the assistance of its membership, which elects the directors.
Under Davis–Stirling, a developer of a common interest development is able to create a homeowner association (HOA) to govern the development. As part of creating the HOA, the developer records a document known as the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions against the units or parcels within the HOA with the county recorder.
Sipes from Detroit, Michigan, where the McGhees purchased property that was subject to a similar restrictive covenant. In that case, the Supreme Court of Michigan also held the covenants enforceable. The Supreme Court consolidated Shelley v. Kraemer and McGhee v. Sipes cases for oral arguments and considered two questions: