Ad
related to: badly written articles
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Anything written under the influence of recreational substances or while tired and emotional. An article about another article, written after the use of aforementioned substances. A fork of an existing article for the sole purpose of adding some humor. The weather in London. Not even a redirect.
Muphry's law is an adage that states: "If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written." [1] The name is a deliberate misspelling of "Murphy's law". Names for variations on the principle have also been coined, usually in the context of online communication, including:
Any article about another article. Any article about a particular millisecond in history. With a few exceptions. Any article articulating other articles' articulation when articulating another article. Hoax articles. For every one that slips through the cracks, there are 100,000 that get caught. Misleading people is very bad.
Read article “What a poorly written article,” the Flip or Flop alum, 39, wrote via Instagram on Tuesday, October 25, alongside a screenshot of the piece — which Anstead, 43 shared via his ...
When the article is a very badly-written article on a small aspect of a bigger field, removing unverifiable content and stubbing the article, or redirecting some of the articles after merging any useful content to a more general article, are better choices than deleting. Exceptions:
It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace. If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio.
Well, the articles I'm talking about aren't usually vandalism. They're non-encyclopedic, or badly written, or some combination. In theory the response to a badly-written article on a reasonable topic is supposed to be to clean up the writing--but who really wants to do that, on an article of minor interest to him?
One can understand the goals and ideals of inclusionism. Basically, that any article can be improved, such as the standard of WP:HEY, and so deletion should be reserved for only the most outrageously slanderous,unsourced, badly written articles. Articles so bad that they would get you shot in outrage by a Deletionist. Articles so bad that in ...