Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Since Firefox version 45, the only mandatory file is manifest.json. Since Firefox 1.0, XPIs from sites other than Mozilla Add-ons are blocked by default. This was an attempt to prevent malicious programs, like computer viruses , Trojans and spyware , from being installed by novice users.
This resulted in version 30, which used the Firefox GUID to improve compatibility with legacy Firefox extensions and started increased development of UXP and Goanna. [36] A few days later, version 30 had to be recalled due to one of the developers causing issues before exiting the project, such as messing up the add-ons server.
Like applications on Android and iOS, Firefox extensions have permission model: for example before installing of extension user must agree that this extension can have access to all webpages, or maybe have permission to manage downloads, [51] or have no special permissions — in such way the extension can be manually activated and interact ...
PDF.js is also used in Thunderbird, [11] ownCloud, [12] Nextcloud, [13] [14] and is available as a browser extension for Google Chrome/Chromium, [15] Pale Moon [16] [17] and SeaMonkey. [17] [18] It can be integrated or embedded in a web or native application to enable PDF rendering and viewing, and allows advanced usages such as Server-side ...
The Mozilla add-ons website is the official repository for Firefox add-ons. [1] In contrast to mozdev.org which provides free hosting for Mozilla-related projects, the add-ons site is tailored for users. By default, Firefox automatically checks the site for updates to installed add-ons. [19]
Firefox Lockwise is a deprecated [5] password manager for the Firefox web browser, as well as the mobile operating systems iOS and Android. [ 6 ] [ 7 ] On desktop, Lockwise was simply part of Firefox, [ 8 ] whereas on iOS and Android it was available as a standalone app.
Add-ons are primarily coded using an HTML, CSS, JavaScript, with API known as WebExtensions, which is designed to be compatible with Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge extension systems. [78] Firefox previously supported add-ons using the XUL and XPCOM APIs, which allowed them to directly access and manipulate much of the browser's internal ...
Compared to writing a full-fledged Firefox extension, user scripting is a very modest step up in complexity from basic web programming. However, Greasemonkey scripts are limited due to security restrictions imposed by Mozilla's XPCNativeWrappers [ 23 ] For example, Greasemonkey scripts do not have access to many of Firefox's components, such as ...