Ads
related to: high time preference vs low price group of words ppt slides template powerpointpopai.pro has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In behavioral economics, time preference (or time discounting, [1] delay discounting, temporal discounting, [2] long-term orientation [3]) is the current relative valuation placed on receiving a good at an earlier date compared with receiving it at a later date. [1] Applications for these preferences include finance, health, climate change.
An alternative way to use high–low pricing is to increase the price for a short time, sometimes as much as 500 per cent, after which it is "discounted" to what its normal selling price. [4] After the price is reduced to the "sale" price, it may often stay at that price for a long time, sometimes longer than two weeks, after which customers ...
Single-peaked preferences are a class of preference relations. A group has single-peaked preferences over a set of outcomes if the outcomes can be ordered along a line such that: Each agent has a "best outcome" in the set, and; For each agent, outcomes that are further from his or her best outcome are preferred less.
This is achieved by having the lowest prices in the target market segment, or at least the lowest price to value ratio (price compared to what customers receive). To succeed at offering the lowest price while still achieving profitability and a high return on investment, the firm must be able to operate at a lower cost than its rivals.
A major rival to the liquidity preference theory of interest is the time preference theory, to which liquidity preference was actually a response. Because liquidity is effectively the ease at which assets can be converted into currency, liquidity can be considered a more complex term for the amount of time committed in order to convert an asset.
In economics, dynamic inconsistency or time inconsistency is a situation in which a decision-maker's preferences change over time in such a way that a preference can become inconsistent at another point in time. This can be thought of as there being many different "selves" within decision makers, with each "self" representing the decision-maker ...