Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Verificationism, also known as the verification principle or the verifiability criterion of meaning, is a doctrine in philosophy which asserts that a statement is meaningful only if it is either empirically verifiable (can be confirmed through the senses) or a tautology (true by virtue of its own meaning or its own logical form).
Time is an inadequate test for truth, since it is subject to similar flaws as custom and tradition (which are simply specific variations of the time factor). Many demonstrably false beliefs have endured for centuries and even millennia (e.g. vitalism). It is commonly rejected as a valid criterion.
By the verification principle, meaningful statements have conditions under which their validity can be affirmed or denied. Statements that are not meaningful cannot be expressed as propositions. Every verifiable proposition is meaningful, although it may be either true or false.
Statements may further be categorised into the analytic and synthetic. Analytic statements are true by virtue of their own meaning or their own logical form, thus tautologies—true by logical necessity but uninformative about the world. Synthetic statements, in contrast, refer to a state of facts concerning the world, therefore are contingencies.
A false statement, also known as a falsehood, falsity, misstatement or untruth, is a statement that is false or does not align with reality. This concept spans various fields, including communication, law, linguistics, and philosophy. It is considered a fundamental issue in human discourse.
Truth is usually held to be the opposite of false statement. The concept of truth is discussed and debated in various contexts, including philosophy , art , theology , law , and science . Most human activities depend upon the concept, where its nature as a concept is assumed rather than being a subject of discussion, including journalism and ...
Joe Biden says that 5 of the last 7 or 8 presidents “were losing at this time by significant margins” in the polls. A look back a history shows that is not the case.
A 2022 study found that individuals exposed to a fact-check of a false statement by a far-right politician were less likely to share the false statement. [29] Some studies have found that exposure to fact-checks had durable effects on reducing misperceptions, [30] [31] [32] whereas other studies have found no effects. [33] [34]