When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mark 16 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16

    Mark 16:9-20 as Forgery or Fabrication A detailed case against Mark 16:9–20, including all relevant stylistic, textual, manuscript, and patristic evidence, and an extensive bibliography. Mark 16 King James Bible - Wikisource; English Translation with Parallel Latin Vulgate Archived 2020-09-22 at the Wayback Machine

  3. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament...

    The stylistic differences suggest that none of these was written by the author of the Gospel of St. Mark. Metzger speaks of the "inconcinnities" between the first 8 verses of chapter 16 and the longer ending, and suggests, "all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with verse 8 ...

  4. Textual criticism of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism_of_the...

    the longer ending of Mark, see Mark 16 (Mark 16:9–20). Jesus sweating blood in Luke, Christ's agony at Gethsemane (Luke 22:43–44). the story in John of the woman taken in adultery, the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11). an explicit reference to the Trinity in 1 John, the Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7–8).

  5. Textus Receptus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_Receptus

    Mark 16:9-20 or the longer ending of Mark is a variant found within the Textus Receptus which has generally been assumed to have been a later addition into the text by modern textual critics. [110] The earliest extant complete manuscripts of Mark, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus , two 4th-century manuscripts, do not contain the last twelve ...

  6. Codex Vaticanus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Vaticanus

    Mark 9:46 [21]: 121 Mark 11:26 [21]: 128 Mark 15:28 [21]: 144 The end of Mark in Vaticanus contains an empty column after Verse 16:8, possibly suggesting that the scribe was aware of the missing ending. It is the only empty New Testament column in the Codex. [22]: 252 Mark 16:9–20 — The Book of Mark ends with verse 16:8.

  7. New World Translation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Translation

    The Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53 – 8:11) and the Short and Long Conclusions of Mark 16 (Mark 16:8–20)—offset from the main text in earlier editions—were removed. [55] The new revision was also released as part of an app called JW Library. [56]

  8. Codex Vercellensis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Vercellensis

    The text of Codex Vercellensis is related to the text of Codex Corbeiensis II (ff 2), another Old Latin copy (in which Mark 16:9-20 is included). According to a respectable tradition, this codex was written under the direction of bishop Eusebius of Vercelli , which would date it to the late fourth century.

  9. Textual variants in the Gospel of Mark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    Mark 5:9 απεκριθη λεγων – E 565. 700. 1010. απεκριθη – D λεγει αυτω – rest of mss. Mark 5:9 λεγιων ονομα μοι – א B C L Δ λεγεων – A W Θ ƒ 1 ƒ 13 Byz. Mark 5:37 ουδενα μετ' αυτου συνακολουθεσαι – א B C L Δ 892.