When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gonzalez v. Google LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Google_LLC

    Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 598 U.S. 617 (2023), was a case at the Supreme Court of the United States which dealt with the question of whether or not recommender systems are covered by liability exemptions under section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which was established by section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, for Internet service providers (ISPs) in dealing with terrorism ...

  3. Virginia v. Black - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_v._Black

    Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that any state statute banning cross burning on the basis that it constitutes prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate is a violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution.

  4. Powell v. Alabama - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._Alabama

    Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama.

  5. Circuit split - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_split

    In United States federal courts, a circuit split, also known as a split of authority or split in authority, occurs when two or more different circuit courts of appeals provide conflicting rulings on the same legal issue. [1]

  6. British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_(Public...

    British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union [1999] 3 SCR 3, 1999 SCC 48 – called Meiorin for short – is a Supreme Court of Canada case that created a unified test to determine if a violation of human rights legislation can be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR).

  7. Kyllo v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States

    Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court ruled that the use of thermal imaging devices to monitor heat radiation in or around a person's home, even if conducted from a public vantage point, is unconstitutional without a search warrant. [1]

  8. Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fazaga - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of...

    The FBI filed a petition for a writ of certiorari that asked the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit's ruling and resolve the question regarding FISA Section 1806(f). The FBI stated that the specific FISA section only applied when the case dealt with charging a specific individual, and did not apply to a general challenge to their ...

  9. Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espinoza_v._Montana...

    The state began to appeal this ruling, but otherwise continued the program with the ordered injunction, which allowed additional scholarships to be granted for several children attending Stillwater. The state's appeal to the Montana Supreme Court was decided in December 2018, which ruled in a 5–2 decision that the entire program was ...