When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Resale price maintenance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resale_price_maintenance

    Resale price maintenance (RPM) or, occasionally, retail price maintenance is the practice whereby a manufacturer and its distributors agree that the distributors will sell the manufacturer's product at certain prices (resale price maintenance), at or above a price floor (minimum resale price maintenance) or at or below a price ceiling (maximum resale price maintenance).

  3. United States v. Colgate & Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Colgate_&_Co.

    Sherman Antitrust Act: United States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 ... According to the ruling, resale price maintenance is generally illegal per se, but if a ...

  4. Vertical restraints - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_restraints

    Vertical restraints can take numerous forms, ranging from a requirement that dealers accept returns of a manufacturer's product, to resale price maintenance agreements setting the minimum or maximum price that dealers can charge for the manufacturer's product.

  5. California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Retail_Liquor...

    1. California's wine-pricing system constitutes resale price maintenance in violation of the Sherman Act, since the wine producer holds the power to prevent price competition by dictating the prices charged by wholesalers. And the State's involvement in the system is insufficient to establish antitrust immunity under Parker v. Brown. While the ...

  6. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leegin_Creative_Leather...

    Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007), is a US antitrust case in which the United States Supreme Court overruled Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. [1] Dr Miles had ruled that vertical price restraints were illegal per se under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

  7. Unilateral policy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unilateral_Policy

    In Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park and Sons, 220 U.S. 373 (1911), the United States Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's holding that a massive minimum resale price maintenance scheme was unreasonable and thus offended Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The decision rested on the assertion that minimum resale price maintenance is ...

  8. Price fixing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_fixing

    Section 48 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) explicitly states, "A corporation shall not engage in the practise of resale price maintenance." A broader understanding of the statutory provision is in Section 96(3)of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), which broadly defines what can be resale price maintenance.

  9. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Miles_Medical_Co._v...

    Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., (220 U.S. 373) (1911), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case on anti-trust grounds that ruled that resale price maintenance, a form of vertical restraint, is illegal per se.