When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    Hearsay is testimony from a witness under oath who is reciting an out-of-court statement that is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit introducing hearsay statements during applicable federal court proceedings, unless one of nearly thirty exemptions or exceptions applies. [1]

  3. Party admission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_admission

    The statement must be against the penal interest (under federal rules of evidence) or the fiscal or social interest (under the rules of states not following the federal rules). The "statements against interest" rule has a rationale that is different from the party admission rule. The courts that created that exception assumed it unlikely that a ...

  4. Hearsay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay

    "Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." [1] Per Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(a), a statement made by a defendant is admissible as evidence only if it is inculpatory; exculpatory statements made to an investigator are hearsay and therefore may not be admitted as ...

  5. Declaration against interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_against_interest

    In United States law, a declaration (or statement) against interest is an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that they would not have made the statement unless they believed the statement was true. For example, if a ...

  6. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    A prior consistent statement is not a hearsay exception; the FRE specifically define it as non-hearsay. A prior consistent statement is admissible: to rebut an express or implied charge that the declarant recently fabricated a statement, for instance, during her testimony at trial; the witness testifies at the present trial; and; the witness is ...

  7. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Life_Insurance_Co...

    Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon, 145 U.S. 285 (1892), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that created one of the most important rules of evidence in American and British courtrooms: an exception to the hearsay rule for statements regarding the intentions of the declarant. [1]

  8. The unexpected significance of Trump trial witness Gary Farro

    www.aol.com/news/unexpected-significance-trump...

    Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. But hearsay evidence is usually inadmissible at trial. So to get hearsay, such as the contents of a business ...

  9. Objection (United States law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objection_(United_States_law)

    Hearsay: An out of court statement used to prove the fact that the statement is being offered for. However, there are several exceptions to the rule against hearsay in most legal systems. [6] Incompetent: the witness is not qualified to answer the question. Inflammatory: the question is intended to cause prejudice.