Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A candidate key is a minimal superkey, [1] i.e., a superkey that doesn't contain a smaller one. Therefore, a relation can have multiple candidate keys, each with a different number of attributes. [2] Specific candidate keys are sometimes called primary keys, secondary keys or alternate keys.
A candidate key (or minimal superkey) is a superkey that can't be reduced to a simpler superkey by removing an attribute. [ 3 ] For example, in an employee schema with attributes employeeID , name , job , and departmentID , if employeeID values are unique then employeeID combined with any or all of the other attributes can uniquely identify ...
In relational database management systems, a unique key is a candidate key. All the candidate keys of a relation can uniquely identify the records of the relation, but only one of them is used as the primary key of the relation. The remaining candidate keys are called unique keys because they can uniquely identify a record in a relation.
every element of Y \ X, the set difference between Y and X, is a prime attribute (i.e., each attribute in Y \ X is contained in some candidate key). To rephrase Zaniolo's definition more simply, the relation is in 3NF if and only if for every non-trivial functional dependency X → Y, X is a superkey or Y \ X consists of prime attributes.
The table's are candidate keys are: S 1 = {Court, Start time} S 2 = {Court, End time} S 3 = {Rate type, Start time} S 4 = {Rate type, End time} Only S 1, S 2, S 3 and S 4 are candidate keys (that is, minimal superkeys for that relation) because e.g. S 1 ⊂ S 5, so S 5 cannot be a candidate key.
The candidate's stance and policy ideas on the following topics in 100 words or less for each topic: Economy : America is more than a country; it was a place of unlimited opportunity birthed by ...
Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.
Candidate C is Smith-dominated if there is some other candidate A such that C is beaten by A and every candidate B that is not beaten by A etc. Note that although this criterion is classed here as nominee-relative, it has a strong absolute component in excluding Smith-dominated candidates from winning. In fact, it implies all of the absolute ...