Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The proof that P = NP implies EXP = NEXP uses "padding".. by definition, so it suffices to show .. Let L be a language in NEXP. Since L is in NEXP, there is a non-deterministic Turing machine M that decides L in time for some constant c.
EXPTIME is one intuitive class in an exponential hierarchy of complexity classes with increasingly more complex oracles or quantifier alternations. For example, the class 2-EXPTIME is defined similarly to EXPTIME but with a doubly exponential time bound. This can be generalized to higher and higher time bounds.
NP "YES" answers checkable in polynomial time (see complexity classes P and NP) NP-complete: The hardest or most expressive problems in NP NP-easy: Analogue to P NP for function problems; another name for FP NP: NP-equivalent: The hardest problems in FP NP: NP-hard: At least as hard as every problem in NP but not known to be in the same ...
It is in NP because (given an input) it is simple to check whether M accepts the input by simulating M; it is NP-complete because the verifier for any particular instance of a problem in NP can be encoded as a polynomial-time machine M that takes the solution to be verified as input. Then the question of whether the instance is a yes or no ...
NP is the set of decision problems solvable in polynomial time by a nondeterministic Turing machine. NP is the set of decision problems verifiable in polynomial time by a deterministic Turing machine. The first definition is the basis for the abbreviation NP; "nondeterministic, polynomial time". These two definitions are equivalent because the ...
An algorithm is said to be exponential time, if T(n) is upper bounded by 2 poly(n), where poly(n) is some polynomial in n. More formally, an algorithm is exponential time if T(n) is bounded by O(2 n k) for some constant k. Problems which admit exponential time algorithms on a deterministic Turing machine form the complexity class known as EXP.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
For example, the formula "a AND NOT b" is satisfiable because one can find the values a = TRUE and b = FALSE, which make (a AND NOT b) = TRUE. In contrast, "a AND NOT a" is unsatisfiable. SAT is the first problem that was proven to be NP-complete—this is the Cook–Levin theorem.