When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_v._Acuff-Rose...

    Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use. [1] This case established that the fact that money is made by a work does not make it impossible for fair use to apply; it is merely one of the components of a fair use ...

  3. 25 Years After: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose and the State of ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/25-years-campbell-v-acuff...

    On March 7, 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court decided for the first time that a parody may be a copyright fair use. In the 25 years that followed, the High Court’s unanimous 9-0 ruling in Campbell v ...

  4. Toward a Fair Use Standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toward_a_Fair_Use_Standard

    Leval's article is cited in the Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., which marked a shift in judicial treatment of fair use toward a transformativeness analysis and away from emphasizing the "commerciality" analysis of the fourth factor. Prior to Leval's article, the fourth factor had often been described as the ...

  5. Acuff-Rose Music - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acuff-Rose_Music

    Acuff-Rose Music was involved in a landmark copyright infringement case in the 1990s: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (510 U.S. 569; 1994). In dispute was the use by rap artist Luther Campbell (then using the alias "Luke Skyywalker") and his band 2 Live Crew of a substantial amount of the Roy Orbison hit song " Oh, Pretty Woman " in a parody .

  6. Transformative use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformative_use

    Transformativeness is a crucial factor in current legal analysis of derivative works largely as a result of the Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

  7. 2 Live Crew - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Live_Crew

    In 1994, Back at Your Ass for the Nine-4 was released. [16] This album the group was billed as "The New 2 Live Crew" [16] as Brother Marquis and Mr. Mixx had left the group, the lineup for this album was Fresh Kid Ice, Luke and new member, Verb. It is the last album with the 2 Live Crew banner to feature Campbell.

  8. Chicken Pot Pie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_Pot_Pie

    Under American law (specifically the 1994 case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.), Yankovic is not legally required to seek the permission of an artist whose song he wishes to parody, but he chooses to do so as a matter of courtesy. [5] [6] Consequently, Yankovic contacted McCartney to seek his blessing.

  9. R. Kelly sued by six victims seeking the millions he still ...

    www.aol.com/r-kelly-sued-six-victims-135517719.html

    To date, the six victims said they've received less than $500,000 of the $10.3 million R. Kelly owes them.