Ad
related to: restraint of trade agreement examplelegal.thomsonreuters.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
- Checklist & Guides
Ensure You Covers All the Issues &
Track the Steps on a Legal Matter.
- Practice Notes
Up-to-Date, Easy to Understand
Explanations on Legal Subjects.
- Compare Plans & Pricing
Find the Right Practical Law Plan
To Fit Your Organization's Needs.
- Small Law Firm Resources
Overcome Your Biggest Challenges
& Spend More Time Practicing.
- Start Your Free Trial
Explore All That Practical Law Has
To Offer. Free for Seven Days.
- In-House Counsel Solution
See How Practical Law Can Help Your
Team Get the Right Answers Faster.
- Checklist & Guides
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A restraint of trade is simply some kind of agreed provision that is designed to restrain another's trade. For example, in Nordenfelt v Maxim, Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co., [2] a Swedish arms inventor promised on sale of his business to an American gun maker that he "would not make guns or ammunition anywhere in the world, and would not ...
Moreover, per Basson v Chilwan, the determination of the reasonableness of a restraint rests on balancing the interests of the parties to the restraint: the agreement is unreasonable and unenforceable in cases where "the interest of the party sought to be restrained weighs more than the interest to be protected", because such an agreement is ...
Vertical restraints are to be distinguished from so-called "horizontal restraints", which are found in agreements between horizontal competitors. Vertical restraints can take numerous forms, ranging from a requirement that dealers accept returns of a manufacturer's product, to resale price maintenance agreements setting the minimum or maximum ...
The House of Lords held that the 5-year agreement was valid and the 21-year agreement was invalid. Lord Reid said he ‘would not attempt to define the dividing line between contracts which are and contracts which are not in restraint of trade’. It was preferable ‘to ascertain what were the legitimate interests of the [suppliers] which they were entitled to protect an
An unreasonable restraint is severable, and the court enforced the amended agreement that Nordenfelt "for the next 25 years, would not make guns or ammunition anywhere in the world , and would not compete with Maxim in any way" thus permitting him to trade in those very items in direct competition with Maxim, illustrating the limited practical ...
Addyston Pipe and Steel Co. v. United States, 175 U.S. 211 (1899), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that for a restraint of trade to be lawful, it must be ancillary to the main purpose of a lawful contract. A naked restraint on trade is unlawful; it is not a defense that the restraint is reasonable.
Trump also had threatened to quit the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement, blaming it for draining U.S. manufacturing jobs to Mexico and prompting a renegotiation of the trade pact with ...
The fact that the appellants' bargaining power vis-a-vis the respondent was strong enough to enable them to adopt this take-it-or-leave-it attitude raises no presumption that they used it to drive an unconscionable bargain with him, but in the field of restraint of trade it calls for vigilance on the part of the court to see that they did not.