When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Deontic modality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontic_modality

    Deontic moods are a category of grammatical moods that are used to express deontic modality. An example for a deontic mood is the imperative ("Come!").. However, many languages (like English) have additional ways to express deontic modality, like modal verbs ("I shall help you.") and other verbs ("I hope to come soon."), as well as adverbials (hopefully) and other constructions.

  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines...

    The Court's rulings in Fraser and Hazelwood state that a "substantial disruption" or infringing on the rights of other students was reason enough to restrict student freedom of speech or expression. Some experts argue that the three individual cases each act independently of one another and govern different types of student speech. [ 7 ]

  4. Speech act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_act

    In political science, the Copenhagen School adopts speech act as a form of felicitous speech act (or simply 'facilitating conditions'), whereby the speaker, often politicians or players, act in accordance to the truth but in preparation for the audience to take action in the directions of the player that are driven or incited by the act.

  5. Performative utterance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performative_utterance

    Searle further claimed that performatives are what he calls declarations; this is a technical notion of Searle's account: according to his conception, an utterance is a declaration, if "the successful performance of the speech act is sufficient to bring about the fit between words and world, to make the propositional content true."

  6. Freedom of speech in schools in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in...

    This is the question of speech which is offensive to prevailing community standards by reason of being vulgar, lewd, or indecent speech. α [9] Courts have held that offensiveness is a question of whether speech is plainly offensive in terms of sexual content or implication, rather than simply expressing ideas and beliefs considered offensive ...

  7. Substantial disruption - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantial_Disruption

    The test, as set forth in the Tinker opinion, asks the question: Did the speech or expression of the student "materially and substantially interfere with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school," or might it "reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference ...

  8. Illocutionary act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illocutionary_act

    The notion of an illocutionary act is closely connected with Austin's doctrine of the so-called 'performative' and 'constative utterances': an utterance is "performative" if, and only if it is issued in the course of the "doing of an action" (1975, 5), by which, again, Austin means the performance of an illocutionary act (Austin 1975, 6 n2, 133).

  9. Metalocutionary act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalocutionary_act

    The term metalocutionary act originated as metalocution (Gibbon 1976, 1983) in functional descriptions of intonation in English and German, by analogy with locution (locutionary act), illocution (illocutionary act) and perlocution (perlocutionary act) in speech act theory. The term metalocutionary act has developed a more general meaning and ...